首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two radiation techniques for the breast boost in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer
【2h】

Comparison of two radiation techniques for the breast boost in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer

机译:新辅助治疗乳腺癌的两种放射线疗法对隆乳的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: After breast conservative surgery (BCS) and whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT), the use of boost irradiation is recommended especially in patients at high risk. However, the standard technique and the definition of the boost volume have not been well defined. Methods: We retrospectively compared an anticipated pre-operative photon boost on the tumour, administered with low-dose fractionated radiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two different sequential boost techniques, administered after BCS and standard adjuvant WBRT: (1) a standard photon beam (2) and an electron beam technique on the tumour bed of the same patients. The plans were analyzed for the dosimetric coverage of the CT-delineated irradiated volume. The minimal dose received by 95% of the target volume (D95), the minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume (D90) and geographic misses were evaluated. Results: 15 patients were evaluated. The sequential photon and electron boost techniques resulted in inferior target volume coverage compared with the anticipated boost technique, with a median D95 of 96.3% (range 94.7-99.6%) and 0.8% (range 0-30%) and a median D90 of 99.1% (range 90.2-100%) and 54.7% (range 0-84.8%), respectively. We observed a geographic miss in 26.6% of sequential electron plans. The results of the anticipated boost technique were better: 99.4% (range 96.5-100%) and 97.1% (range 86.2-99%) for median D90 and median D95, respectively, and no geographic miss was observed. We observed a dose reduction to the heart, with left-sided breast irradiation, using the anticipated pre-operative boost technique, when analyzed for all dose-volume parameters. When compared with the sequential electron plans, the pre-operative photon technique showed a higher median ipsilateral lung Dmax. Conclusion: Our data show that an anticipated preoperative photon boost results in a better coverage with respect to the standard sequential boost while also saving the organs at risk and consequently fewer side effects.
机译:目的:建议在进行乳房保守手术(BCS)和全乳放疗(WBRT)之后,特别是在高危患者中,建议使用增强辐射。但是,标准技术和增压量的定义还没有很好地定义。方法:我们回顾性地比较了预期的术前光子对肿瘤的增强,低剂量分次放疗和新辅助化疗与两种不同的顺序增强技术,在BCS和标准辅助WBRT后进行的治疗:(1)标准光子束( 2)在同一患者的肿瘤床上使用电子束技术。对计划进行了分析,以确定CT描绘的辐射量的剂量学范围。评估了目标体积的95%(D95)收到的最小剂量,目标体积90%(D90)收到的最小剂量和地理遗漏。结果:15例患者进行了评估。与预期的增强技术相比,顺序光子和电子增强技术导致的目标体积覆盖率较差,中位数D95为96.3%(范围94.7-99.6%)和0.8%(范围为0-30%),中位数D90为99.1 %(范围90.2-100%)和54.7%(范围0-84.8%)。我们在26.6%的连续电子计划中发现了地理缺失。预期的增强技术效果更好:中位数D90和中位数D95分别为99.4%(范围96.5-100%)和97.1%(范围86.2-99%),并且未观察到地理缺失。当对所有剂量-体积参数进行分析时,我们使用预期的术前增强技术观察了左侧乳房照射对心脏的剂量降低。与顺序电子计划相比,术前光子技术显示同侧肺Dmax更高。结论:我们的数据表明,相对于标准的顺序增强,术前预期的光子增强可带来更好的覆盖率,同时还可以挽救有风险的器官,从而减少副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号